This is Jaqen from QuickSnap, a permissionless marketplace for vote incentives built on top of Snapshot. Our platform enables projects using Snapshot for governance to access a vote bribe market, akin to Votium, but designed for a more generic vote incentives market.
Given that Shutter has been integrating with Snapshot for over a year now, it’s very interesting to discuss when Shutter combines with Quicksnap could transform voting behaviors and the dynamics between voters and vote buyers.
I’ve conducted a thorough analysis to understand how this synergy could potentially boost Shutter’s adoption on Snapshot.
The integration poses some interesting possibilities, which is something for good.
Potential increase in Shutter adoption.
Vote buyers may be more inclined to allocate funds for rewards.
Encourages a higher turnout of token holders to vote
Excited to hear your ideas on how QuickSnap and Shutter together could make voting more fun and get more people involved. Let’s talk about making things better for everyone!
Here is the deep dive article if you are interested to read more :
Hey, I’m all about that open-source life too! Just so you know, QuickSnap’s smart contract is open for everyone to peek at. And we’re using a Merkle tree to keep things transparent and legit with vote validation and rewards. This architecture allows for independent validation of both the voting integrity and the equitability of reward allocation.
regarding the rest of our tech stack – the frontend and backend parts – we’ve chosen to keep them closed source for now as we just launched the product
Yes, the repo for our smart contracts has been made private. However, you’re encouraged to review the smart contract directly on the blockchain, which is the version currently in production.
I think this is a great idea. Since its permissionless not only the project can incentivize but also other participants can add incentives to the proposal.
