I voted against this proposal.
Not because I do not like Fjord, but because it is bad governance to pass proposals from the service provides themselves when the DAO delegates do not know about alternatives.
The proposal does not contain fair and neutral information
- What are alternatives for Fjord
- What are the metrics should proposals should be compared between the different liquidity programs
- If Shutter token holders would have a better liquidity provision program with someone else
Thus, the DAO delegates cannot make a good decision that benefits the token holders based on this proposal. This proposal is self-dealing for Fjord.