Encrypt The Mempool POIDH Bounty: Provide feedback on the draft EIPs
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the POIDH Bounty: Provide feedback on the draft EIPs category
|
|
0 | 48 | June 17, 2026 |
|
POIDH Bounty Entries Still in Review
|
|
0 | 23 | August 3, 2026 |
|
Application-layer review of EIP-8105 & EIP-8184: header split, representation gap, and an unsourced Motivation claim
|
|
1 | 38 | July 30, 2026 |
|
A Systems-Level Review of EIP-8105 and LUCID: Critical Findings, Formal Analysis, and a Path to Hegotá
|
|
2 | 37 | July 30, 2026 |
|
LUCIDs ticket says too much: a pre-reveal gas fingerprint, and why backruns can't be priced
|
|
0 | 22 | July 30, 2026 |
|
Spec-level review of EIP-8105 & EIP-8184: block-validity dilemmas, key-vote algebra, unspecified value flows, and a nonce-reuse hazard
|
|
3 | 79 | July 30, 2026 |
|
Monetizing Benign Backrunning to Accelerate Adoption of Encrypted Mempools
|
|
0 | 18 | July 30, 2026 |
|
Key-Withholding Optionality as a Structural MEV Risk in EIP-8105 and LUCID: Analysis, Quantification, and Mitigation Proposals
|
|
2 | 100 | July 28, 2026 |