# POIDH Bounty: Provide feedback on the draft EIPs

**URL:** https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/c/mev/poidh-bounty-provide-feedback-on-the-draft-eips/23.md

[Latest](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/latest.md) · [Categories](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/categories.md) · [Tags](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/tags.md)

---

## [About the POIDH Bounty: Provide feedback on the draft EIPs category](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/about-the-poidh-bounty-provide-feedback-on-the-draft-eips-category/872)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Loring-Brainbot](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/Loring-Brainbot)\
**Replies:** 0

</div>

---

## [POIDH Bounty Entries Still in Review](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/poidh-bounty-entries-still-in-review/929)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@AnthonyCaravello](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/AnthonyCaravello)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [August 3, 2026, 3:29pm UTC](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/poidh-bounty-entries-still-in-review/929 "2026-08-03T15:29:06Z")

</div>

A huge thanks everyone who submitted to the bounty - providing your feedback on the draft EIPs (8105 & 8184) to encrypt the public mempool on Ethereum! We’re still reviewing the 6 submissions, many are very detailed. We appreciate your patience. We will give an update on the bounty ASAP.

---

## [Application-layer review of EIP-8105 & EIP-8184: header split, representation gap, and an unsourced Motivation claim](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/application-layer-review-of-eip-8105-eip-8184-header-split-representation-gap-and-an-unsourced-motivation-claim/920)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Crezno](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/Crezno)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [July 30, 2026, 5:00pm UTC](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/application-layer-review-of-eip-8105-eip-8184-header-split-representation-gap-and-an-unsourced-motivation-claim/920 "2026-07-30T17:00:28Z")

</div>

Submission for the “Encrypt The Mempool!” POIDH bounty (poidh.xyz/mainnet/bounty/11). Wallet address (used to add funds to the pool): 0x934C80e3a3e9136eE3558950385B66Ac5e7D9bf7 Name/pseudonym: Crezno Quotes are from the specs as they stand on ethereum/EIPs master as of 2026-07-24. Scope The consensus-layer mechanics o…

---

## [A Systems-Level Review of EIP-8105 and LUCID: Critical Findings, Formal Analysis, and a Path to Hegotá](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/a-systems-level-review-of-eip-8105-and-lucid-critical-findings-formal-analysis-and-a-path-to-hegota/922)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Pascaline](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/Pascaline)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [July 30, 2026, 5:00pm UTC](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/a-systems-level-review-of-eip-8105-and-lucid-critical-findings-formal-analysis-and-a-path-to-hegota/922 "2026-07-30T17:00:13Z")

</div>

Wallet Address: used to fund the bounty pool : 0x5dc697f2799bd232cad2d479c379ff305b699f9b Name / Pseudonym: Pascaline Role / Experience: Blockchain/backend Engineer & Independent Ethereum Protocol Researcher Contact: Pascalineazodo1@gmail.com Executive Summary This review identifies eleven concrete findings in EIP…

---

## [LUCIDs ticket says too much: a pre-reveal gas fingerprint, and why backruns can't be priced](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/lucids-ticket-says-too-much-a-pre-reveal-gas-fingerprint-and-why-backruns-cant-be-priced/924)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@thedude](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/thedude)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [July 30, 2026, 4:59pm UTC](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/lucids-ticket-says-too-much-a-pre-reveal-gas-fingerprint-and-why-backruns-cant-be-priced/924 "2026-07-30T16:59:49Z")

</div>

Name: thedude Wallet Address: 0x9ffAab6c24d4fb58d61b26B08c8795E9E323F28B # LUCID feedback: two arguments the thread hasn’t made yet — backrun adjacency vs. pricing, and the gas-limit anonymity leak Cross-posting to the Shutter Forum since the Ethereum Magicians thread is locked. This builds on the submissions alread…

---

## [Spec-level review of EIP-8105 & EIP-8184: block-validity dilemmas, key-vote algebra, unspecified value flows, and a nonce-reuse hazard](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/spec-level-review-of-eip-8105-eip-8184-block-validity-dilemmas-key-vote-algebra-unspecified-value-flows-and-a-nonce-reuse-hazard/906)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@vellichorlabs](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/vellichorlabs)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [July 30, 2026, 10:55am UTC](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/spec-level-review-of-eip-8105-eip-8184-block-validity-dilemmas-key-vote-algebra-unspecified-value-flows-and-a-nonce-reuse-hazard/906 "2026-07-30T10:55:58Z")

</div>

\> Submission for the “Encrypt The Mempool!” POIDH bounty (poidh.xyz/mainnet/bounty/9). \> Wallet address (used to add funds to the pool): \`0x34015a2EE7f71341883876933AFc1DE977Cf7eC8\` \> Name/pseudonym: \*\*vellichorlabs\*\* · Role: independent protocol reviewer \> All quotes are from the specs as they stand on \`ethereum/EI…

---

## [Monetizing Benign Backrunning to Accelerate Adoption of Encrypted Mempools](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/monetizing-benign-backrunning-to-accelerate-adoption-of-encrypted-mempools/919)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Dee13](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/Dee13)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [July 30, 2026, 10:52am UTC](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/monetizing-benign-backrunning-to-accelerate-adoption-of-encrypted-mempools/919 "2026-07-30T10:52:24Z")

</div>

Monetizing Benign Backrunning to Accelerate Adoption of Encrypted Mempools Name: Dee Wallet Address: 0x96e9025466a3e15dc2c3b28c1c6c71523a93f703 1. INTRODUCTION Ethereum’s public mempool has made frontrunning and sandwich attacks a persistent problem for users. EIP-8105 and EIP-8184 address this by introducing encryp…

---

## [Key-Withholding Optionality as a Structural MEV Risk in EIP-8105 and LUCID: Analysis, Quantification, and Mitigation Proposals](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/key-withholding-optionality-as-a-structural-mev-risk-in-eip-8105-and-lucid-analysis-quantification-and-mitigation-proposals/897)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Bonus](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/u/Bonus)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [July 28, 2026, 12:58pm UTC](https://shutternetwork.discourse.group/t/key-withholding-optionality-as-a-structural-mev-risk-in-eip-8105-and-lucid-analysis-quantification-and-mitigation-proposals/897 "2026-07-28T12:58:47Z")

</div>

Key-Withholding Optionality as a Structural MEV Risk in EIP-8105 and LUCID: Analysis, Quantification, and Mitigation Proposals Wallet Address: 0x5e4e5ea537ce7e79b8a0fc4f0cb520e9b8b5dae5 Name / Pseudonym: Favor| Bonux Role / Experience: Independent Protocol Researcher & Builder Contact: Telegram: Contact @favor59 Exec…
